Carbonate and pumice sands: the soils that break correlations.

Most geotechnical practice is built on silica sands. Carbonate sands and pumice sands behave differently — and when standard correlations are applied to them, projects get surprised. This is our deepest specialism.

Why these soils are different

Carbonate sands (biogenic, calcareous deposits) and pumice sands are both fundamentally crushable:

The result: deceptively strong-looking ground that settles more than expected, or densifies in unexpected ways during vibrocompaction and dynamic compaction.

What we do

Ground improvement and acceptance on crushable fills

Compaction of carbonate and pumice fills needs acceptance criteria calibrated to the material. Standard practice borrows silica-sand targets; the senior practice is to establish a shell correction factor for the specific fill — through trials, CPT verification and laboratory calibration — so that "compacted" means something real in that ground, not something borrowed from another geology. See ground improvement for reclaimed land.

Why it matters on a reclamation project

Carbonate and pumice sands are common across the tropics and in volcanic settings — exactly where much of the world's reclamation is happening. A project that treats them as "just sand" discovers the difference during compaction or in the first years of settlement. A project that characterises them properly builds to a verified specification.

Working with crushable soils?

We have lived with these materials full time on site. Talk to us about your project.

[email protected]